Protection of Rural Red Revolutionary Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Territorial Spatial Planning: A Case Study of Wan’an County, Jiangxi Province
Abstract
and failures in implementation. Using Wan’an County in Jiangxi Province as a case study, this paper argues that, within the framework of territorial spatial planning, establishing a comprehensive protection register to confer legal status, applying a negative-list approach for precise
spatial governance, and creating a homestead land-replacement mechanism to balance stakeholders’ rights can effectively address these challenges. Together these measures form a “planning–control–implementation” closed loop that promotes the integration of rural historical site
protection into the spatial governance system underpinning rural revitalization.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Cheng, Q. Y. (2022). The dilemmas and countermeasures of cultural relics protection and utilization at lower revolutionary levels.
Cultural Relics Authentication and Appreciation, (7), 37-40.
[2] Zhang, J. F., Xie, B. Q., & Wu, L. (2023). Protection and utilization of revolutionary cultural relics in Putian City in the context of
rural revitalization. Journal of Fujian University of Technology, 21(2), 157-161+180.
[3] Wang, L. H., Zhao, Z. K., Qin, J. J., et al. (2023). Research on the development of township red revolutionary culture industry: A
case study of Dangui Village, Xundian County, Yunnan Province. China Market, (24), 79-82.
[4] Li, H. (2015). Research and reflections on strengthening the protection of rural revolutionary sites: A case study of Yongxin County.
Southern Cultural Relics, (3), 236-237+231.
[5] Hu, X. W., & Ji, C. Y. (2022). Thoughts on the protection and utilization of revolutionary cultural relics in southwest Zhejiang,
Lishui in the new era. Journal of Lishui University, 44(4), 54-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/utc.v11i2.267
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jiamin Zou
